Thursday, August 16, 2012

Charles Manson Truth Project 2012 - Interview with Star







19 comments:

cielodrivecom said...

The media dramatizes things? You mean like adding an echo to an interview.

cielodrivecom said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Cease2 said...

#mybrainhurts

Suze said...

Well said, Cease2. My brain hurts, too.

jmacky said...

Is this Star chick for real? Does she think it is still 1969? This woman needs mental help. can't believe this bullshit is still flowing 43 years alter.

candy and nuts said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
eviliz said...

It's Lynn, Sandy and Brenda all over again. Make it stop!

TomG said...

This is what happens when women think. Do they really think or is it a bug kind of buzzing around in a jar?

AustinAnn74 said...

This right here is an example of why Manson can NEVER EVER be released. To this day, he has weak-willed MORONS worshipping him. This girl is too mentally gone to listen to reason. I don't think she is understanding that this trial is OVER. It has been for over 40 years. MOVE ON. Atascadero State Hospital is CALLING!!!!!

A BOY AND HIS DOG said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Stacey L. said...

Ok, I'm confused. I had to stop listening bc my ADD kicked in and my mind was wandering, but.....her thing about people making deals with the cops to testify against Charlie, like Linda or whoever. Don't cops do that all the time? Why is that so shocking? Maybe I'm missing the point.

Oh and at the beginning she totally sounds like she's at a "meeting". "Hi my name is Star and I'm friends with Charles Manson". Mason Anonymous?

Stacey L. said...

I mean Manson Anonymous. Oh and I've driven through Corcoran. NOTHING TO DO THERE AT ALL, enough to drive anyone crazy.

candy and nuts said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
candy and nuts said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
jamhan1974 said...

Cops are usaly bad cops about 95% of the time. They don't always lie, just most of the time. I dont like the guy all that much(manson)I dont fallow him, and never would. But i am sure he did NOT get a fair trial. How could he, his face was posted everywhere. And the media did find him guilty, as they do most before they are found guilty. So in a case that was so high profile. He couldn't get a fair trial then or now.

jamhan1974 said...

see ya in hell chuck!

andy said...

she sound no dumber then any hippy or deadhead

AustinAnn74 said...

I know I have already made a comment, but I must add further. Does this delusional airhead really think that her "God" was worried about the air, trees, water & animals whenever he (and his friends) left Spahn Ranch as polluted as a city dump? You think he cared about anything other than molesting prepubescent girls? Me think NOT......

ALIKEN said...

I agree with Jamhan1974, Plus, Manson can not help or decide who "speaks on his behalf" or "follows him" (how ever you want to look at it) Bottom line is, Manson DID NOT get a fair trial & is NOT the monster the media has made him out to be. This man has paid the price 1000x over for his role in these crimes & even if he were guilty he should have been released 20 years ago. Take away the media hype & all the Helter Skelter books & whats left? A man falsely accused... Look, if Manson were this crazed, killing leader then why did the prosecution offer him a deal in the beginning stages of the trial? Why was so much evidence pointing to Manson's innocence ignored? Why wasn't there a mistrial declared after;
1. The first Prosecuting Attorney assigned to the case, Aaron Stovitz, violated a federal gag order on the case three months into the trial. Stovitz was then replaced by Vincent Bugliosi, who was later brought up on charges of perjury in the Manson case FOR VIOLATING A GAG ORDER just as Stovitz!! (BTW, Years later when Stovitz was interviewed he said that he believed that Charles Manson had an unfair trial.)
2. A juror stole one of the Sharon Tate death photos and sold it to a European tabloid magazine. The juror was not excused and the trial went on. The juror should have been excused (and prosecuted) for this but never was.
3. Charles Manson was given a newspaper with the headlines “Nixon Declares Manson Guilty” which the jury saw.
These 3 reasons alone should have been grounds for a mistrial but none were. None of the jurors were excused and the trial went on.... These are but a few of the MANY reasons Manson should NOT be in prison.
One can not overlook injustice no matter how much time has gone by. In fact, the more time that goes by the more unjust the case becomes & after 43 years, the Charles Manson case remains one of the most talked about FOR A REASON!! HE WAS RAILROADED! THE SCAPEGOAT! The almighty powerful leader? Come on, open your eyes people... they all turned on him to save their own asses!! That alone should prove how much power & influence he had over them....