tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8171370990642927748.post1422174231553355670..comments2024-03-27T21:24:06.590-04:00Comments on The Manson Family Blog: Most likely to be in the wrong place at the wrong timeMatthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06766282574442161929noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8171370990642927748.post-2349522639375363932011-05-02T20:42:48.318-04:002011-05-02T20:42:48.318-04:00"Most likely to be in the wrong place at the ..."Most likely to be in the wrong place at the wrong time"<br><br>- as a victim yes, Parent probably as much/more so any others, Shea & Tate vying (though, separating the wholly innocent from the 6 degrees separation the rest cuts it close, my opine.)<br><br><br>Other end the spectrum, perpetrator also offers a nefarious candidate:<br><br>* a murder, a misappropriated car, a roadside the highway, a knife and a nap = Beusoleil.<br><br><br>Under the 'there but for the grace of linda' category a saladin nader-and that unknown person in the car at the stoplight escaped a similar destiny.<br><br><br>How many others eluded?<br><br><br>Under 'wishful thinking' category - had Charlie gone to high school can we not imagine him having been on if not the President of debate team?<br><br>_________1900 Yesterdayhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12639358685598052920noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8171370990642927748.post-60151230327741091212011-05-03T16:41:09.329-04:002011-05-03T16:41:09.329-04:00i'm going to kindly ask this- what are you say...i'm going to kindly ask this- what are you saying?danielhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08731334855706019152noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8171370990642927748.post-1825179473142247362011-05-03T22:37:44.561-04:002011-05-03T22:37:44.561-04:00nice response, daniel. I second that emotion. I en...nice response, daniel. I second that emotion. I enjoy 1900's posts, but no disrespect, after I read them I can't decide if he is some sort of essenes existentialist or just really wasted.leary7http://www.blogger.com/profile/16573687537798248297noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8171370990642927748.post-21848405471087320012011-05-04T01:10:28.517-04:002011-05-04T01:10:28.517-04:00I love it when they beg, a nod grim realization / ...I love it when they beg, a nod grim realization / self-indictment, with all due respect. <br><br><br>Let me kindly rejoinder, try too ease confliction, albeit bluntly.<br><br><br>A young student was assigned home work, namely to read a particular writers creative muse and to then report back narrative form his interpretation the writer. <br><br><br>The student was nonplussed - in over his head. So, he asked his father, "what do you think this writer is trying to say?" <br><br><br>The father gave it an half-hearted try before throwing up his hands exasperation, offering -"Jesus Christ! How the hell should I know what some stupid son of a bitch is trying to say!?!" <br><br><br>And so, the student did his best make his own interpretation. That student was yours truly - father was mine - and the writer was Ludwig Wittgenstein, generally regarded as a genius. <br><br><br>We might have wished Wittgenstein write down to us/our level of understanding as twere. In truth, be no need. Case of this example, I believe everyone can / will cast a singular judgement... no need to elaborate further. <br><br><br><br>I'm reminded of a line courtesy the Captain, 'Cool Hand Luke' -<br><br>"What we have here is a failure to communicate". Through trial and error, confluence was reached eventually, if not easily.<br><br><br>Otherwise, there is always the option resignation in the form Star Trek's Science Officer Mr. Spock -<br><br>"You may find 'having' is not as much as 'wanting' ". Whether you find it easier embrace a Mr. Spock's precursive caution or seek fuller understanding is up to you.<br><br><br><br>It is not as important some have not the capacity understand as that they try/continue to - which is to say a manner of speaking yours/others curiosity regards 1900 Yesterday - he is as Lays Potato Chip, blogdom.<br><br><br>We could take each paragraph and break each down one by one, into component parts, scarce internet paper & time the arbiter making said daunting.<br><br><br>I leave it to anyone as every.<br><br><br>Back to nominations "most likely to be in the wrong place, at the wrong time" - those 'happened upon' this missive mine in response to your furtive plea, same.<br><br><br>And the spokes on the wheel go round & round...<br><br><br>: )<br><br>_____1900 Yesterdayhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12639358685598052920noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8171370990642927748.post-67282182713981847972011-05-04T13:12:43.801-04:002011-05-04T13:12:43.801-04:00I love how 1900 writes. Super-dense, like a thick...I love how 1900 writes. Super-dense, like a thick, flourless brownie. The "special" kind, of course. it has a rhythym, a lyricism to it. It is not literal truth, but it tickles Patty's inner archetypes. Rock on, friend.Panamint Pattyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07717777500117142160noreply@blogger.com