tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8171370990642927748.post4614220991045236978..comments2024-03-27T21:24:06.590-04:00Comments on The Manson Family Blog: Roommate RevengeMatthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06766282574442161929noreply@blogger.comBlogger199125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8171370990642927748.post-88735856559055604052020-10-21T17:55:34.769-04:002020-10-21T17:55:34.769-04:00John Phillips said that the word PIG written in bl...John Phillips said that the word PIG written in blood was actually PIC named after PIC Dawson mamma Cass boyfriend who was an international drug dealerAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12082666235146451091noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8171370990642927748.post-9115830852365277372020-10-21T17:51:55.470-04:002020-10-21T17:51:55.470-04:00Walt Disney used to live at 3301 Waverly Dr. Accor...Walt Disney used to live at 3301 Waverly Dr. According to ed Sanders book. Disney was an FBI informant informing the FBI about the Communist party taking over the music industry in HollywoodAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12082666235146451091noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8171370990642927748.post-15787042201932748902020-01-21T13:09:43.621-05:002020-01-21T13:09:43.621-05:00Manson on several occasions has said he went to Ha...Manson on several occasions has said he went to Harold True's house BEFORE going to the Labianca's house the night of the murders. He said he found the True house to be uninhabited and locked up. Only then did he happen to see the house next door (Labiana's) occupied... which surprised him because that house had always been vacant when he partied at True's place. So yes... Manson went to the True house FIRST.PaulHhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02965666446497527968noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8171370990642927748.post-90082502088126500182019-07-25T17:56:40.148-04:002019-07-25T17:56:40.148-04:00Has anyone seen the new movie - “Once upon a time ...Has anyone seen the new movie - “Once upon a time - in Hollywood” ? How does it match up to this blog ? Curious. I will see the movie in good time. <br />Thanks, <br />Joseph Yoklavich <br />Uncle Buddy - Nephew Joseph Yoklavichhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06829481543814550839noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8171370990642927748.post-23323608127395419882018-10-21T22:29:33.865-04:002018-10-21T22:29:33.865-04:00Sorry folks, but I'm not convinced. For obviou...Sorry folks, but I'm not convinced. For obvious reasons, I'd love to be. But there's just too much in that explanation that contradicts what we already have been told <i>from the horse's mouth</i>. It's tempting to enumerate in concise form why I don't believe it, but I will just leave it at that.grimtravellerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00025774296829848608noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8171370990642927748.post-3760980064171510602018-10-10T10:46:33.786-04:002018-10-10T10:46:33.786-04:00Joseph,
As the author of the post I truly appreci...Joseph,<br /><br />As the author of the post I truly appreciate you taking the time to set the record straight. Your uncle struck me as an amazing man while I was researching the post and you have confirmed that. I hope yours is the last word on this post. <br /><br />If there is anything else you would want to share send me an e-mail at the address up there to the right and I'll write a follow up post. If not, I understand. <br /><br />Thank you again<br /><br />DavidDavidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06551377673977145628noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8171370990642927748.post-40790136837797109332018-10-09T20:49:49.737-04:002018-10-09T20:49:49.737-04:00OK - On behalf of my Uncle Buddy - Ernest Baltzell...OK - On behalf of my Uncle Buddy - Ernest Baltzell - I need to get some of this story straight about the events prior to the murders. All of the cousins, relatives, nephews and nieces have heard the stories straight from Harold True (which has been at dozens of our family celebrations, holiday and events) and our own Uncle Buddy - Ernest Baltzell - know of the events prior in their own words. <br /><br />Here how it goes: Harold True Met Charles Mansion somewhere around Santa Monica Beach, and told he was having a party at his place. Charles shows up with 3 other girls, the party did involve drugs ( I do not know what exactly_ Mansion ask Harold and Buddy if they can crash there and even moved in. Mansion became a real ASSHOLE, and Harold and Buddy had to physically kick him out. He screamed and sweared he was going to get back at them. The girls left with him as Harold and Buddy made sure they left as he got off the property. With that said, both Harold and my Uncle Buddy have said with a lot of reservation, that the day/night the murders took place, it was the intention of Charles Mansion to kill them because they had kicked him out of the house. <br /><br />Beyond that, my both Harold and my Uncle Buddy, have NEVER said much about the events other than the fact that Charles Mansion came over only once, was a total ASSHOLE, and did not want to do anything with that wack job once he insisted that he and the girls could move in. TOTAL loser. <br /><br />As fo Harold True - Our family have only experience a great friend to my Uncle Buddy, and a tremendous family that evolved and joined us in many holiday events. He was extremely intelligent, yet definitely on another stratosphere some time when you had a deep conversation with him. I personally thought he was always honest and down to earth. <br /><br />As for my Uncle Buddy.- Ernest Baltzell - You can not find a better person that would always be there for you. I loved my Uncle, because no matter what he would help you, give his own shirt off his back, and was best Uncle anyone could have. He love his family, cousin, nephews, nieces, great nephews and great nieces. I love him dearly, and miss him so much. <br /><br />It is hard to read some of the comments on this blog. Our family talked about it this week, and Buddy’s sisters memorial in Burbank this last weekend. Getting the story right is importan. It will be interesting how this upcoming moving will present the facts and truths. <br /><br />All the best, <br />Joseph Yoklavich<br />Uncle Buddy - Nephew <br />Joseph Yoklavichhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06829481543814550839noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8171370990642927748.post-35568694695107998062018-10-07T19:12:15.912-04:002018-10-07T19:12:15.912-04:00AstroCreep said...
you talk about Charlie’s nee... AstroCreep said...<br /><br /> <b>you talk about Charlie’s need to revenge for being wronged. Had he shacked up with Harold and the boys, the Dennis Wilson situation would have likely never happened. So possibly Charlie doesn’t dwell on this as a negative, because of that</b><br /><br />The Dennis Wilson situation was already in motion when Harold was up to leave the house. True wasn't due to leave until September.grimtravellerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00025774296829848608noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8171370990642927748.post-52243538045381198232018-10-06T22:02:15.563-04:002018-10-06T22:02:15.563-04:00RudyWebersHose said...
Kind of interesting th... RudyWebersHose said...<br /><br /> <b>Kind of interesting that theres no trial testimony or police interview (at least from what ive seen) about Pat, Leslie or Clems recollections of what was said upon arriving at 3301</b><br /><br />There isn't, but the psychiatrist, Joel Hochman, who examined Leslie, said something that I thought was interesting during the 'penalty' phase. He said that when they stopped in front of "a house" she didn't know where they were but she said to him that her thoughts were "well surely somebody knows somebody here." We know it was the former True house they stopped closer to. Now, for balances sake, it must be pointed out that quite a bit of what she said to Hochman was pure, McGann'69 styled lies, for example mentioning everyone that was in the car and saying there was her and 5 others {she names them and leaves out Charlie}. But rather like much of the three females' penalty phase utterances, there was truth and opinion mixed with lies and what Leslie said to Hochman was possibly eye opening because she drew a distinction between much of the driving around that was done that night to what she described as fancy areas {she says she was vaguely aware of these} and this particular place which caused her to think that it was known to someone which implies a certain specificity.grimtravellerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00025774296829848608noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8171370990642927748.post-7198099683216175252018-09-03T12:49:44.743-04:002018-09-03T12:49:44.743-04:00Although I kind of get what he means, this is none...Although I kind of get what he means, this is nonetheless an interesting choice of words from Vincent Bugliosi on January 14th 1971 during the second day of his summing up of the evidence of the guilt phase of the TLB trial:<br /><i>"As you recall from Linda's testimony, Manson either drove that night or when he wasn't driving, he instructed Linda to drive and when Linda was driving, Manson and Manson alone gave Linda instructions. No one else in that car gave Linda any directions, other than Charlie Manson [Aside ¬> this is corroborated by Leslie over a year before when talking to Marvin part though Bugliosi didn't know this and couldn't have used it anyway]. <br />It was Manson who decided what houses and places to stop at in Pasadena, not Tex or anyone else.<br />It was Manson who decided not to enter the house and the church in Pasadena.<br />It was Manson who decided that he wanted to kill the driver of the white sports car, not Tex or anyone else.<br />And of course it was Manson who finally decided to drive to Harold True's place and after he got out of the car, of course, he entered the LaBianca residence ~ we don't know how...."</i><br /><br />Well, I thought it was interesting. But then, I would !<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />grimtravellerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00025774296829848608noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8171370990642927748.post-51087371448345693402018-08-20T17:36:13.143-04:002018-08-20T17:36:13.143-04:00Harold True did once say the girls didn’t like him... <b>Harold True did once say the girls didn’t like him because he had college degrees and a shelf full of books. Books and college degrees (there is no evidence Baltzell or Yost attended college and Swerdloff attended a trade school) don’t make you a ‘pig’, money (and position) does.<br />By any definition of the term 'pigs' that I have seen the roommates were not 'pigs'. That means the target is wrong if HS is the motive</b><br /><br />From Brooks Poston's testimony at the TLB trial;<br /><br />BUGLIOSI: In addition to the lawman, did Mr Manson say the word 'pig' meant anything else ?<br /><br />POSTON: <i>Yes.</i><br /><br />Q: Who ?<br /><br />A: <i>It meant the man that went to college, the White man.</i> And <i>it meant the wealthy White people, the ones who wore staunch white shirts, such as yourself.</i><br /><br />Q: My wife does not starch them though, Brooks.<br /><br />A: <i>Staunch.</i><br /><br />Q: I thought you said 'starch.' Go ahead.<br /><br />A: <i>And everyone who is in more or less the society of the establishment, the White establishment.</i><br /><br />So it would appear that college folk and those that went along with the establishment {though not necessarily part of it} were also regarded as pigs. If Manson was pissed off at the 3 roommates {and Atkins words would seem to indicate this, even if she didn't know specifically why 3301 Waverly had been selected or if 3267 was at any point a target}, it doesn't seem to me to be out of the realms of possibility that 3267 may have been the initial target. Not when one takes into account a series of things that have been pointed out already. It's important to remember, we're talking about a thought.<br /><br />AstroCreep said...<br /><br /> <b>I don’t think HS was Charlie’s motive, but I do believe it was the narrative he preached that enabled the crimes</b><br /><br />That would tend to indicate that as far back as December '68 or at the very least February '69, Charlie was planning murder, given what he'd said to Brooks Poston {Poston was at Barker from Feb} and Paul Watkins. And late June '69 is around the first time Charlie is recorded as saying to someone that they were going to have to show Blackie how to start HS {according to Watkins}.<br /><br /> grimtravellerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00025774296829848608noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8171370990642927748.post-78805637078635953032018-08-20T00:09:15.607-04:002018-08-20T00:09:15.607-04:00Pax Vobiscum:
The Berberians do not appear at any...Pax Vobiscum:<br /><br /><b>The Berberians do not appear at any other Waverly address in the 1968 or 1969 directories. Eleven days later they are the owners of 3267 Waverly Drive. So what were they doing in the area on August 9-10? If they were just random sightseers how did LAPD find them?<br />I believe the answer is they were renting the main house or living there waiting for the August 21st transaction to close. Why else would the very soon to be owners be on Waverly Drive the day before and after the murders? There seems to me to be no other logical answer unless this is one of the weirdest coincidences of all time. <br />This suggests that the Berberians were at 3267 Waverly Drive on the night of August 9-10. They spoke to police about their observations on the afternoon of August 10th which is likely the 9th. That means that 3267 Waverly Drive was not vacant on August 9-10, 1969</b><br /><br />From the TLB trial:<br />Bugliosi: Now, the home on the right in this photograph, do you recognize that as the house in which Harold True formerly resided ?<br /><br />Frank Patchett: <i>That's correct</i><br /><br />Q: At any time did you go to this particular home ?<br /><br />A: <i>Yes, I went to that home the day after ~ this would have been Monday, after the LaBianca murder, in checking the crime scene at the LaBianca home, I then went next door to the house</i><br /><br />Q: August 11 1969 ?<br /><br />A: <i>I believe that was Monday, yes</i><br /><br />Q: You went to the former residence of Harold True ? <br /><br />A: <i>I did</i><br /><br />Q: 3267 Waverly Drive ?<br /><br />A: <i>That's correct</i><br /><br />Q: Was the home vacant at that time ?<br /><br />A: <i>Yes, it was</i><br /><br /><b>Specifically, I have found no indication that True ever linked back up to Baltzell and Yost and True and Baltzell are in the image. <br />I think it was probable that Baltzell and Yost distanced themselves from the whole Waverly Drive scenario very quickly after the murders and their connection came to light</b><br /><br />This <a href="http://www.lsb3.com/search/label/Harold%20True" rel="nofollow">phone conversation</a> {if it is indeed genuine ~ scroll down to the 3rd post} comes from around 1990 and in it, Judy Hansen says that she got True's number from Ernie. <br /><br /> RudyWebersHose said...<br /><br /> <b>Youre forgetting a few things</b><br /><br />I'm not forgetting anything. The post brought up a number of interesting points, questions and mysteries. If we can find possible answers to any of them, should we just pretend they don't exist ?<br /><br /><b> in that same phone interview he said at least twice that Manson had nothing to do with the killings</b> <br /><br />He never once said that Charlie didn't have anything to do with the killings. What he said regarding the killings was <i>"All Charlie Manson ever told those people at any time is</i> 'do what you think is right.' <i>Now when you tell a person who is mentally deranged to do what is right, you have killing of Jews, you have killing of Palestinians, you have the elimination of Indians..that's what you do when you apply human thought and logic and reason to people that are crazy because it doesn't come out the way you figured."</i> Later he says <i>"Charlie's not a killer, Charlie's nuts, Charlie's institutionalized"</i> ~ but he says that in reply to Judy Hansen saying that the Marina Habe murder looked like "one of Chuck's" too. On top of that, he makes a clear statement as to Charlie's involvement, as demonstrated in my previous post.grimtravellerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00025774296829848608noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8171370990642927748.post-71940953106152766812018-08-19T22:23:53.803-04:002018-08-19T22:23:53.803-04:00Specifically "all Charlie Manson ever told th...Specifically "all Charlie Manson ever told those people at anytime is do what you think is right" and "Charlies not a killer, Charles nuts, Charlies institutionalized"RudyWebersHosehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06281984776301324237noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8171370990642927748.post-31296476825868462022018-08-19T19:04:57.944-04:002018-08-19T19:04:57.944-04:00Youre forgetting a few things, in that same phone ...Youre forgetting a few things, in that same phone interview he said at least twice that Manson had nothing to do with the killings and also he knew damn well that Charlie knew of alot more places in LA than just Cielo and WaverlyRudyWebersHosehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06281984776301324237noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8171370990642927748.post-38984432003068539882018-08-18T16:32:07.481-04:002018-08-18T16:32:07.481-04:00Pax Vobiscum:
We know Baltzell, Yost and Swerdlof...Pax Vobiscum:<br /><br /><b>We know Baltzell, Yost and Swerdloff all left within a month of True or at the same time. So any conversation probably went like this: ‘Sorry, Charlie, but we are all leaving’. This is hardly a rejection worthy of homicide. No one was going to stay there after September, not just Manson. <br />Another problem is that I have not been able to find any reference to Manson actually carrying a grudge over this or being angry about it. If the snub was a big deal wouldn’t Harold True remember the reaction? While he mentions the incident in his interview in January 1970 with Aaron Stovitz he mentions it almost in passing and doesn't ascribe any animosity to Manson over it.</b><br /><br />Some years later however, True stated <i>"Charlie Manson, where did he go <b>to do the killings ?</b> He went to the 2 places he knew in LA, and 2 places only; He went to my house and he went to Melcher's house <b>because we told him he couldn't live in our house</b> and Terry Melcher told him he couldn't make shit with.....a record album."</i><br />Aside from now acknowledging that Charlie 'did' the killings, despite previously stating Charlie was no killer, one wonders why he'd come to that conclusion. He's making a clear connection between strong feelings Manson had towards the two particular houses the murders happened in and the purported reasons for those feelings. More noteworthy, True makes no mention of 3301 but 3267, his old house. Nothing about the LaBianca house.<br />It doesn't prove anything but it's an interesting ingredient to throw into the pot.<br /><br />grimtravellerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00025774296829848608noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8171370990642927748.post-39793576112104495412018-08-12T13:56:14.038-04:002018-08-12T13:56:14.038-04:00Kind of goes along with what that alleged nephew o...Kind of goes along with what that alleged nephew of Baltzell said about Baltzell thinking Charlie went there first and then next doorRudyWebersHosehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06281984776301324237noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8171370990642927748.post-6813506535508594272018-08-11T17:18:51.801-04:002018-08-11T17:18:51.801-04:00Aaron Stovitz said...
So they, after circling the...Aaron Stovitz said...<br /><br /><b>So they, after circling the city for a while, they go into the True, uh, to the True residence. No one is home, so they, go next door."</b><br /><br />What's notable about that statement is that Stovitz of all people, having interviewed True just two months before this statement, would know that Manson knew that True had long moved out of the house. Yet he states in an off the record interview that it was the former True house that was visited first and then finding no one in, next door was then gone to. grimtravellerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00025774296829848608noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8171370990642927748.post-63663628327403917782018-08-10T14:03:57.715-04:002018-08-10T14:03:57.715-04:00There was a guesthouse at 3267 as well, id be inte...There was a guesthouse at 3267 as well, id be interested in whether Mrs Posella was living in it on that weekend, im pretty sure she and her son lived there while the main house was being used by Harold and friendsRudyWebersHosehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06281984776301324237noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8171370990642927748.post-51723046358450872582018-08-08T23:13:51.713-04:002018-08-08T23:13:51.713-04:00It isn't known if that house [3267] was occupi...<b>It isn't known if that house [3267] was occupied. If it was, it is not known whether they were in. Perhaps LAPD asked them and the answer has just never been disclosed</b><br /><br />Over on Cielo's site is a possible answer to the question of whether or not the former True house was occupied on the night of the LaBianca murder. There's this somewhat revealing interview of Aaron Stovitz from March 19th 1970 by 2 Davids, Dalton and Felton, both reporters from Rolling Stone. The interview formed the basis of that June 25th issue in which Charlie speaks about HS, the Beatles, what Blacks are going to do and biblical prophecy. It's interesting for a number of things Stovitz says, such as more than once making the point that his name must not be used in the article {it eventually becomes the alias 'Porfiry} and saying which things can and can't be printed. However, for the purposes of the topic at hand is this:<br /><br /><i>"Why did they pick out LaBianca, ok? There's a fella by the name of Harold True, and this fits in with your LSD acid bit. A year before this incident, in August of '68, Harold True lived in this house next door to LaBianca. They had gone over there and had pot parties and LSD parties, there at that house.<br />Harold True was supposed to go into the Peace Corps. Uh, he's a college boy at UCLA and so forth. Uh, they moved - he moved out at the end of the year, his two friends continued living. These, uh, Manson family used to keep coming there all the time, but then finally everyone moved to, out of there, and the house was vacant, at the time the LaBiancas were killed - the house where True lived. This is right next door to where, uh, the LaBiancas lived, is Harold True's house.<br />So they, after circling the city for a while, they go into the True, uh, to the True residence. No one is home, so they, go next door."</i><br /><br />Stovitz is certain that the house was vacant at the time of the killings and he must have had pretty good reasons for stating that.<br />The interview gives a useful insight into what the prosecution understood at the time and what it didn't and there is so much in it that didn't make the final article.grimtravellerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00025774296829848608noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8171370990642927748.post-88526973533023706962018-08-07T18:54:10.648-04:002018-08-07T18:54:10.648-04:00David said...
I assume you are not saying tha... David said...<br /><br /> <b>I assume you are not saying that you believe Atkins told the truth before the Grand Jury</b><br /><br />If you mean the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, then no, I don't. But there are large parts of what she said that I do believe were the truth. There are also parts that I think she simply didn't recall, that were later filled in by Linda and some parts that she deliberately left out.<br /><br /><b>I tend to be an evidence guy</b><br /><br />And it's one of your classic contributions to many of the debates that forever rage on this subject. Looking closely at the evidence certainly helps tame some of the flights of fancy that have had their day in the sun on TLB sites over the years.<br /><br /> RudyWebersHose said...<br /><br /> <b>I dont read between lines, i read what is on the reports</b><br /><br />It depends what's between the lines, for me. The reports can only go so far and if you go through the 4 Police reports most of the leads and theories that came up were dead end streets in the end. Yeah, they needed to be checked out and it's as well they were.<br />As an aside, when Susan Atkins said to Virginia Graham that the Police were so far off the track on the Cielo murders, those could be considered to be famous last words.grimtravellerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00025774296829848608noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8171370990642927748.post-12010678198570851022018-08-07T18:15:42.142-04:002018-08-07T18:15:42.142-04:00David said...
If Atkins told the truth before... David said...<br /><br /> <b> If Atkins told the truth before the Grand Jury then Kasabian's "Sadie make it stop" moment never happened</b><br /><br />I don't agree with that. Atkins "telling the truth" doesn't mean that she recalls every single happening. She doesn't recall Frykowski being shot, let alone twice, let alone by Watson, even though she pins every murder on him and no one else. She never mentions it, either to Howard, Graham, Caruso, Caballero, Bugliosi or to the Grand Jury. She doesn't even recall hearing the shots. Where there are joint participants in the commission of a crime or any traumatic event for that matter, there may well be things that one recalls that another doesn't, especially when there are multiple things going on. That's just a reality of life.<br /><br /><b>According to her testimony this is the first time Atkins left the house after the murder of Sharon Tate</b><br /><br />Granted. Interestingly, she was in the same room as Abigail and yet expresses surprise that she's outside. She comments on it 3 times. She doesn't know how she got outside, she didn't see her leave ~ and yet there she is.<br />She herself, to both her lawyers and the GJ, talks about things being confused and confusion. There are some interesting little discrepancies between what she says to her lawyers on the 1st December and what she says to the GJ on the 5th.<br />Unfortunately, because of the way things worked out with Atkins recanting and all, it was never necessary to quiz her about whatever discrepancies may have showed up. Bugliosi did say that he was hoping to quiz her further. Even there though, it wouldn't have sorted out the problem because Linda probably wouldn't have said most of the things she went on to say from her position of strength when Atkins did recant.<br />But really, the point I was making to RWH was that because Atkins' GJ testimony was accepted by the prosecution as being fairly sound {with obvious exceptions}, it doesn't really matter what Atkins said later about Linda being in the house because she provided corroboration for Kasabian saying that she wasn't. It was more of an ironic observation.grimtravellerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00025774296829848608noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8171370990642927748.post-72138901703451384822018-07-31T08:05:07.647-04:002018-07-31T08:05:07.647-04:00RudyWebersHose/SAG/Dave1971 said...
Looks like my...<i>RudyWebersHose/SAG/Dave1971 said...<br /><br />Looks like my comments are being screened for some reason</i><br /><br /><b>You are not being screened. David's post is 14+ days old so all comments for it are moderated as per our admin settings. If you continue to contribute without a meltdown this time no one will interfere with your comments.</b><br /><br /><br />Matthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06766282574442161929noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8171370990642927748.post-25525999410751322162018-07-30T22:31:06.204-04:002018-07-30T22:31:06.204-04:00Somehow Tex had a larger knife, most likely the ba...Somehow Tex had a larger knife, most likely the bayonet as most of the fatal wounds 1 1/2 to 1 3/4 inches long and 4 inches deep, buck knives arent leaving wounds like thatRudyWebersHosehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06281984776301324237noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8171370990642927748.post-32331223146498439932018-07-30T16:11:47.320-04:002018-07-30T16:11:47.320-04:00How am i doing that exactly?How am i doing that exactly?RudyWebersHosehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06281984776301324237noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8171370990642927748.post-14490674027632211222018-07-30T14:22:14.085-04:002018-07-30T14:22:14.085-04:00Looks like my comments are being screened for some...Looks like my comments are being screened for some reasonRudyWebersHosehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06281984776301324237noreply@blogger.com