I have no doubt that many of you who visit this forum find one of the most compelling things about the Cielo murders to be the remaining anomalies--the mismatches between the hard evidence and the testimony or related narrative. I would like to create a list of agreed-upon anomalies that is composed of two parts: major anomalies and minor anomalies. I then invite additions to the list. Once we've settled (more or less) on the items, I'd propose to create an article to deal with each one separately, in some level of depth, or maybe in logical groupings of a few that are closely related. We can then poke at the presented scenario(s) and try to create a hierarchy of the likelihood of each version of the scenario that evolves.
I expect that this will be a collaborative effort to help clear as much of the fog surrounding the events at Cielo as possible. I will not explore personalities other than how they might have directly affected the events.
We are never really going to know what happened, and we all know that, but I think that using a collaborative effort we may tighten things up a bit.
I'm working from the following assumptions for this exercise:
- The "official narrative" that the prosecutors used to convict the Cielo perpetrators is essentially correct in all aspects that it purports to account for; it is likely, however, to be a subset of the complete event.
- All physical evidence is correct and reliable.
There are many incompatibilities between the two assumptions, and these create the anomalies I'm addressing. I'm seeking to narrowly define the possibilities, or even to resolve some of the anomalies to within perhaps 90% certainty. In some cases the narrative may have to give; in others, the evidence.
1) Blood evidence at the doorway/porch.
2) Towel on Sebring's head.
This is at odds with all testimony.
3) Stab wounds on Tate's back.
At odds with all testimony.
No version of the narrative unambiguously describes a situation in which she was attacked from behind.
1) Broken guard rail.
2) Marks on Tate's face.
Explained as being done by Parent, but without much detail.
3) Knife found at the scene with no blood evidence.
Watson has mentioned at least twice that he inflicted cuts on Tate's face as the first wounds; the Noguchi autopsy report and testimony say they are rope burns.
4) Moving or rearranging some of the bodies.
The knife found in the chair had no blood on it, but appeared to be coated with some unidentified substance.
5) Glasses near the trunks.
Initial investigators state that they believed that Tate's body had been in some sense handled or moved.
6) Blood trail on the trunks.
Unexplained in the official narrative.
On close inspection the blood trails on the trunks appear to have been made while the trunks were in a different position than in which they were found.
I'll look for replies and compile suggestions for about a week, then publish the resulting master list and get started soon thereafter. I'll construct and propose an initial hypothesis, and we can beat on it to see if we can make it stronger. Other readers, after viewing the list, may want to take one of the items and create a hypothesis to present: that would be great, so far as I'm concerned.
In creating these lists I'll be the final arbiter as to what is included.
Some years ago, David did an excellent, in depth seven part series that explored the evidence at the Cielo crime scene. I recommend looking at it, or re-reading it. We'll cover some of his points, perhaps coming at them from different angles.
Any suggested additions? If so, please reply.