Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Questionable Questions from B&B Enterprises Questionnaire!



Once again, ladies & gentlemen (and psychos) out there in blog land, I went ahead, and read the transcript of Bobby Beausoleil's 1985 parole hearing, which DebS was kind enough to post earlier, and came upon some questionable questions from a questionnaire that was given to interested parties of B&B Enterprise publications. Can it be safe to assume that these questions were not pulled out of anyone's (large) rear, and were directly found in a parole hearing transcript? You bet! Without further delay, I bring you "B&B Enterprises" questionable questions from a questionnaire:

Who is responsible for the most discipline in your family?
Earliest age?
Did you become sexually aroused as a child by being spanked?
Did you ever become sexually aroused as a child while watching someone else spanked?
Were you ever spanked unjustly?
Can you describe your feelings?
Do you have children your own age who are in charge of other children who you sometimes spank for disciplinary reasons?
When you think of spanking, do you envision yourself as a spanker or a spankee?
Do you participate in spanking with another adult?
Do you think of spanking as purely disciplinary or erotic?
A mixture?
What is your favorite position for administering a spanking?
As a spanker do you prefer bare hand, paddle, hair brush, or other?
What should be the position of underpants during a spanking?
What do you, what, do you prefer stories of boys or girls about being spanked?
Some spanking literature stresses playfulness.

NOTE: Well, heck, I guess there isn't a thing wrong with these types of questions. Any NORMAL magazine/publication would, and SHOULD always ask their readers if they get aroused by being spanked. Don't you think MAD magazine, or Glamour, or even National Geographic should ask those too? Of course! There isn't anything remotely creepy about those questions!





18 comments:

ColScott said...

Of course they are creepy, agitator. They aren't illegal, or pertinent to parole, both of which you foolishly seem to believe.

leary7 said...

"not pertinent to parole", says you, persistent bully.
I will wait for Mr. Dilligaf to weigh in on that.
Seems to me speaks to mindset which speaks to rehabilitation.
Personally, I have always been in the camp that Bobby B. has every bit as much darkness and evil in him as Charlie and Tex. But you obviously have a man crush on him and anyone who speaks ill of Lucifer you denigrate and assault.
Oh well, a boy has to have his hobbies I suppose.

adam said...

Thinking out loud,

Do these type of pictures satisfy a sick lust that might otherwise end up with real children being abused and therefor in a way provide a service?

OR do they just feed a frenzy that might one day push a pervert into trying the real deal?

DebS said...

adam said...
Thinking out loud,

Do these type of pictures satisfy a sick lust that might otherwise end up with real children being abused and therefor in a way provide a service?

OR do they just feed a frenzy that might one day push a pervert into trying the real deal?
----------------------------

Adam I am still researching the subject of spanking and particularly the spanking of children. I found an article from 2002 that speaks to your questions.

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2002-03-13/news/0203130349_1_videos-child-pornographers-pornography

I am still working on whether or not publications such as the ones produced by B&B Enterprises have bearing on the "ring" described in the article.

leary7 said...

I hate to refer to Ted Bundy as an expert, but if you watch youtube videos of Bundy's last days he talks extensively about how his obsession with the True Detective type porno - women tied to chairs with gags and shirts torn open, which dominated his teen years - lay at the base of his sexual peversions.
I think the answer to your question, Adam, is both. For some it is probably a means to an end. For others, looking at soft porn or soft bondage or spanking stuff probably does lead to a need for higher and higher and then real depravity in order to satisfy their urges. Hard to imagine what the specific tipping point would be - obviously different for each individual.

Heidi S said...

Isn't it ironic that we are wondering if Bobby was involved in kiddie porn? The guy who stabbed someone to death, not a crime of passion as in "I found my wife in bed with him" but over money, drugs or both? I would say if you are capable of cold blooded murder you could be capable of anything leading up to it? Call me crazy but I was never in doubt that the guy should never ever see the light of day or that these people (so called "Family" members) are mostly superfreaks of the worst kind.
I will wait on the edge of my seat for ColScott to critique my grammar/ spelling. :)

AustinAnn74 said...

Thank you! Could not have said that better!!

ColScott said...

leary7- thank you- I was having a bummer night and then I heard you cite Dilligaf as an authority. That closeted, retarded, conservative law and order guy is an authority on precisely nothing.

But thanks the laugh cheered me up.

And bullying is by definition impossible on a message board like this. NO ONE forces agitators like Ann or sad sacks like St to read ANYTHING here.

No go away.

---------
Awesome the hits keep coming. The guy who take Timothy's name (he would be so sad) cited TED BUNDY as an accurate source. Because when it comes to telling the truth he is SOOO the guy!

-----------

Heidi there is nothing to critique in either your spelling or your content.

Farflung said...

Apparently there is some ‘new’ standard regarding murder and the quantity. People who have done worse than Bobby are on parole, so he is ‘overdue’? Is this a slippery slope?

Some kid (20 years old) massacres a bunch of children in a Connecticut elementary school so that becomes the new “gold standard” for murder and parole? Movie theater killings in Colorado are now lesser? Aren’t these relevant comparisons to mayhem and severity? I’m afraid the measure escapes me at this point. Should the killing of 26 people at the Sandy Hook Elementary School set a de facto bar for sick cruelty? Since the ‘Family’ only killed whatever number of people, X number of years ago, they all should be set free, since a new level of depraved behavior has been established?

Since there appears to be such a measure used in the parole arguments, versus some crimes of equal or lesser magnitude, I would say the whole crew should be released under the guise of this ethos. And it should remain this way until someone finds a way to kill 27 or more children in a single act; then release the last offender. They escaped the gas chamber by some bizarre fluke of the law, they should be eternally grateful. Not seeking release with some sense of self righteous indignation

starship said...

Even some Nazi war criminals were eventually released on parole.

Which in some cases, led to further consequences.

Not that it justifies any of this in any way whatsoever.

leary7 said...

weak, Col, really weak. And I am a fan of Dennis, not Timothy.

sherm maniac said...

"Do you have children your own age who are in charge of other children who you sometimes spank for disciplinary reasons?"

-children your own age
-they are in charge of other children
-who you SPANK

???

Panamint Patty said...

If Tex is "Stabby" then Bobby is "Spanky." Spanky Beasoleil has a better ring to it that Bummer Bob, no?

Heidi S said...

PS: If it is true that the family women were encouraged to perform fallatio on infants and dogs, spanking and kiddie porn seem like small potatoes.

leary7 said...

Can you see yourself as Darlene, Patty?
Little Rascals.

eviliz said...

Hi it's me Eviliz. Anyone remember me? If not screw you all. New Members, thanks for joining us. Some things I need to comment on-


#1) Were you ever spanked unjustly?

If someone asked me this question my answer would be-
"Yes by Grump and Panamint Patty in the desert last spring".

#2)Panamint Patty said...
If Tex is "Stabby" then Bobby is "Spanky." Spanky Beasoleil has a better ring to it that Bummer Bob, no?

Ahhhh LMAO!

#3)Heidi S said...
PS: If it is true that the family women were encouraged to perform fallatio on infants and dogs, spanking and kiddie porn seem like small potatoes.

Bullshit story to shock us all.

#4) FARF- long time no see (probably on my part). Glad to see you!!

Austin Anne and Deb- you bitches ROCK!!

#5) Colonel- as always nice to see you.
If I knew you were coming I would of had Matt put on his sexy French maid outfit and at least vacuumed and dusted.




Panamint Patty said...

Leary: Totally. While writing this post Patty was laughing at the mental image in her head of Charlie, Tex, Bobby and Bruce all sitting around a wooden crate and swearing allegiance to the He Man Women Hater's Club. It coulda happened that way. JK

PS Hi Lizzie. xxx

leary7 said...

now Patty, THAT IT a Manson movie I could get behind...the Manson Family as Little Rascals hooligans. Sort of a South Park treatment. I wish I was still in film school, that would be an interesting grad project.