Your Resource for the Tate-LaBianca (TLB) MurdersYesterday :: Today :: Tomorrow :: Where No Sense Makes Sense
"Most likely to be in the wrong place at the wrong time"- as a victim yes, Parent probably as much/more so any others, Shea & Tate vying (though, separating the wholly innocent from the 6 degrees separation the rest cuts it close, my opine.)Other end the spectrum, perpetrator also offers a nefarious candidate:* a murder, a misappropriated car, a roadside the highway, a knife and a nap = Beusoleil.Under the 'there but for the grace of linda' category a saladin nader-and that unknown person in the car at the stoplight escaped a similar destiny.How many others eluded?Under 'wishful thinking' category - had Charlie gone to high school can we not imagine him having been on if not the President of debate team?_________
i'm going to kindly ask this- what are you saying?
nice response, daniel. I second that emotion. I enjoy 1900's posts, but no disrespect, after I read them I can't decide if he is some sort of essenes existentialist or just really wasted.
I love it when they beg, a nod grim realization / self-indictment, with all due respect. Let me kindly rejoinder, try too ease confliction, albeit bluntly.A young student was assigned home work, namely to read a particular writers creative muse and to then report back narrative form his interpretation the writer. The student was nonplussed - in over his head. So, he asked his father, "what do you think this writer is trying to say?" The father gave it an half-hearted try before throwing up his hands exasperation, offering -"Jesus Christ! How the hell should I know what some stupid son of a bitch is trying to say!?!" And so, the student did his best make his own interpretation. That student was yours truly - father was mine - and the writer was Ludwig Wittgenstein, generally regarded as a genius. We might have wished Wittgenstein write down to us/our level of understanding as twere. In truth, be no need. Case of this example, I believe everyone can / will cast a singular judgement... no need to elaborate further. I'm reminded of a line courtesy the Captain, 'Cool Hand Luke' -"What we have here is a failure to communicate". Through trial and error, confluence was reached eventually, if not easily.Otherwise, there is always the option resignation in the form Star Trek's Science Officer Mr. Spock -"You may find 'having' is not as much as 'wanting' ". Whether you find it easier embrace a Mr. Spock's precursive caution or seek fuller understanding is up to you.It is not as important some have not the capacity understand as that they try/continue to - which is to say a manner of speaking yours/others curiosity regards 1900 Yesterday - he is as Lays Potato Chip, blogdom.We could take each paragraph and break each down one by one, into component parts, scarce internet paper & time the arbiter making said daunting.I leave it to anyone as every.Back to nominations "most likely to be in the wrong place, at the wrong time" - those 'happened upon' this missive mine in response to your furtive plea, same.And the spokes on the wheel go round & round...: )_____
I love how 1900 writes. Super-dense, like a thick, flourless brownie. The "special" kind, of course. it has a rhythym, a lyricism to it. It is not literal truth, but it tickles Patty's inner archetypes. Rock on, friend.
Post a Comment